Early Modern Art: Innovations in Science and Technology
The early 20th Century brought with it a period of intense economic, social, and political turmoil. Industrialization, consumerism, social mobility, and the struggles of the working class brought were at the forefront. Mass production and new scientific innovations were only intensified by the onset of World War I. War has almost always been the ultimate catalyst for invention. The exponential growth in the automobile industry, the invention of electric washing machines, home refrigerators, and even frozen food all boomed during this period. In 1929, the stock market crashed and led to what we now call the Great Depression. Almost 25% of the United States workforce was unemployed at its peak and this number does not include farmers who lost their lands and homes due to foreclosure (Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum). During this period, many scientific innovations were seen as only helping the wealthy in an almost surreal way. Some artworks in particular seem to capture this brilliantly. They are the Man and Machine by Ida York Abelman, Catastrophe by Doris Lee, and Land of Plenty by Lucienne Bloch.
Ida York Abelman’s Man and Machine is a lithograph currently residing in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. It was created in New York and is one of the public works created through the Works Progress Administration in 1939 (The Metropolitan Museum of Art).
This work in particular seems to express the complexities of the era. A hand pushes the machine that seems ready to crush or decapitate its operator. Another man shovels nearby, unaware of what is going on above him. The power of the machine is represented by the upside-down V, and the lines draw your eye to the center where the victim awaits. Through the use of form, we see the emotionless expression of the machine worker, seemingly oblivious about what he is about to do. Texture is used to show the dirt and grime on the hand of the operator and the clothing of the other worker.
Abelman is simultaneously displaying the exploitation of humans and machines by each other. Humans here are depicted as both the product and the worker. Ultimately one of the main drivers of the Great Depression was the factories closing and the machines shutting down. It is a strong commentary on how readily humanity can put itself in harm’s way for the sake of progress. Who is benefiting here? It’s certainly not the worker. Is it the machine?
Doris Lee’s Catastrophe is an oil on canvas painting currently
residing in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. It was created in
New York in 1936, purportedly after watching the Hindenburg flying over and
imagining what it would look like if it exploded (The Metropolitan Museum of
Art).
This work shows people descending, some in parachutes and
some without, from a flame-engulfed dirigible above the Manhattan skyline. The
use of form here shows the contrast between some figures waving their arms
frantically and others seemingly lifeless. The use of tone draws our eye first
to the skyline full of parachuting and plummeting passengers. The use of color around
the ship and water suggests doom or even despair. Burning or drowning
are only to be avoided by reaching the contrastingly sunnier beach where people
wait to pull them out of the water.
Lucienne Bloch’s Land of Plenty is a woodcut currently
residing in the Philadelphia Museum of Art in Philadelphia. It was created in the
United States in 1935 (The Philadelphia Museum of Art).
The scene depicts a family moving across a corn field with
looming electric poles and lines overhead. The use of tone here highlights the
abundance of food and power lines against the sky. The darker forms of the
family and the fence poles take a more ominous tone. The use of form shows the
family slightly hunched and is suggestive of the downtrodden. Another V shape
is prominent as the descending power lines and the horizontal fence frame in the
food that hangs just out of reach.
This artist’s piece really speaks to the theme of innovations not applying equally to all. At first glance, it might be a depiction of an abundance of food and resources. The closer we look, that doesn’t appear to be the case. The family depicted appears poor and possibly migrating for work or even shelter. Surrounded by an abundance of crops for food and an energy grid supplying power to the masses, the folk here are being kept out by the barbed wire fence. It is a powerful and tragic depiction of the inequality these scientific innovations don’t always resolve.
Abelman’s Man and Machine is a look at man’s role in the
cogs of industrialization, while Lee’s Catastrophe is a warning about the
consequences of runaway innovation, and Bloch’s Land of Plenty is a
commentary on the inequality of innovation. Each of these pieces are powerful and I certainly appreciate the messaging, I personally might not
display any in my home. I prefer inspirational pieces to social, economic, and
political warnings.
Works Cited:
1933-1934 Century of Progress Exposition. Chicago
Architecture Center. https://www.architecture.org/learn/resources/architecture-dictionary/entry/1933-1934-century-of-progress-exposition/. Accessed: 7/22/2024.
Catastrophe by Doris Lee. The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Available at: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/487833.
Accessed: 7/22/2024.
Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum. “Great
Depression Facts - FDR Presidential Library & Museum.” Fdrlibrary.org,
2016. https://www.fdrlibrary.org/great-depression-facts.
Accessed: 7/22/2024.
Land of Plenty
by Lucienne Bloch. The Philadelphia Museum of Art. Available at: https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/75293.
Accessed: 7/22/2024.
Man and Machine by Ida York
Abelman. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Available at: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/360320.
Accessed: 7/22/2024.
Hi Rusty! Great post! I really enjoyed the pieces that you chose. I was very appealed to your first piece as it almost is an illusion and took me a minute to really pick out the differences. I do think you hit a big concept and events of the Early Modern times, and these pieces were a great display of all sides. Overall I really enjoyed your post and I do agree that I wouldn't put any of these up within my home, but as for looks I think the second piece is very interesting as well.
ReplyDelete